Debating Islamic extremism: is this the best we can do?

Anshuman Mondal, author of Islam and Controversy, deplores 鈥榠mpoverished鈥� discussion of rights and obligations

Published on
February 5, 2015
Last updated
June 10, 2015

Source: Kobal

Bird-brained: the film Four Lions made 鈥榡ihadists seem ridiculous鈥� to Muslims

鈥淚f I had hair to tear out, I would,鈥� says Anshuman Mondal when asked about the debate following last month鈥檚 terrorist attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

The recent publication of his monograph Islam and Controversy, which explores freedom of speech and the Muslim faith, has put Mondal, a reader in English literature at Brunel University London, in the midst of public discourse on the subject in the UK.

But, says Mondal, 鈥淚 think the debate has been very impoverished and very disappointing.鈥�

成人VR视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Of the edition of Charlie Hebdo published immediately after Islamist terrorists killed its editor and 11 others, he adds: 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think the cover [depicting a weeping Muhammad] helped, though of course they had every right to publish it. The response among Muslims was just: 鈥楾here you go again; did you have to do it that way?鈥欌€�

Drawing on case studies ranging from cartoon images of Muhammad published in a Danish magazine to reactions to Salman Rushdie鈥檚 novel The Satanic Verses, Mondal argues forcibly in Islam and Controversy that the right to freedom of speech comes with responsibilities.

成人VR视频

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭he hard question is not whether you have the right to do that 鈥� of course you do 鈥� but is that the right thing to do?鈥� he argues.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not always wrong to be offensive. Sometimes you need to be offensive, especially if you鈥檙e attacking powerful figures, and some of these terrorists really need attacking and they need offending,鈥� says Mondal.

鈥淭his is why Chris Morris鈥� [film] Four Lions was such a good satire, because it managed to make these jihadists seem absolutely ridiculous. Not just in the eyes of Western people, but in the eyes of Muslim people who鈥檝e been longing for them to get some form of satiric treatment. I鈥檝e never seen Charlie Hebdo take that level of care over it.鈥�

In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo killings and related deadly attacks, the political agenda quickly shifted from restating fundamental liberal values to calls to boost security measures to prevent such atrocities happening again.

成人VR视频

ADVERTISEMENT

David Cameron has promised the security services tough new surveillance powers if the Conservatives win the May general election, and he has met with US President Barack Obama to discuss the potential outlawing of encrypted online communication.

But along with several other academics quoted in 成人VR视频 in recent weeks, Mondal argues that this approach is inconsistent. 鈥淲e seem prepared to sacrifice important rights 鈥� privacy, association 鈥� for the defence of this self-centred attitude to free speech,鈥� he notes.

Born to a Hindu mother and a Muslim father, Mondal is used to living with a range of identities.

Despite his love of cricket and English literature, he confesses to never feeling truly comfortable with being British. At the same time, he deplores what he views as a growing anti-Semitism within the British Muslim community.

成人VR视频

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked if the central tenet of his book is the idea that people should just be nicer to each other, he says 鈥測es鈥�. His parents鈥� relationship was, he notes, 鈥渁 living, breathing riposte to the idea that respect can鈥檛 transcend cultural boundaries鈥�.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT